Faith, Cognitive Dissonance, and the Psychology of Religious Experience


0

Faith, Cognitive Dissonance, and the Psychology of Religious Experience

“I have actually seen that a number of the people I have recognized who have left the Church did not do so because they thought insufficient, however since they thought too much. In their excessive idealism, they have actually held Church leaders or God to assumptions which were inevitably let down, and they have actually really felt betrayed. They have actually not believed God when He told them that ours is a lonely, gloomy world where we will certainly pass away, and they have selected instead to think one more version of fact, one which asserts that they can be secured from being molested, let down, or made afraid. They have been upset at God or other Church leaders for not keeping promises which God has not, as a matter of fact, made. I keep in mind with rate of interest that of all the names for the Savior in holy writ, He is never ever called the Preventer. Firm is the strategy, and also this means that all of us, consisting of Church leaders, learn by our mistakes and also undergo misinformation, loss of sight, hubris, and also error. The old joke is frequently true: In the Catholic church everybody claims the pope is foolproof however nobody believes it; and also in the Mormon church everybody states the prophet is imperfect however nobody believes it.

It’s an old and also frequent spiritual inquiry, and also it shows up in many forms. It is the question Jesus asks the adherents that hear his unpleasant and offending discussion on being somebody whose flesh need to be consumed and also whose blood drunk by those that would have eternal life. The discussion perplexes several, who reverse and also follow him say goodbye to, and then, to those who continue to be Jesus asks the question, “Will ye additionally disappear?” 1 To the man that seeks out Jesus to recover his deeply troubled kid, the question is suggested, “If thou canst believe, all points are possible to him that believeth.” 2 To Nephi, come close to by an angel after he is brought away to the top of a high hill, the question is extra straight: “Believest thou that thy dad saw the tree of which he hath talked?” 3 As well as to the bro of Jared, that asks to see the premortal Jesus after hearing his voice and seeing his hand, the concern is perhaps most clearly mentioned, “Believest thou the words which I shall talk?” 4.

Believest thou? I am progressively impressed by the implications of this simple question, and by how often it goes to the heart of my temporal issues. Do I believe God’s commandments as well as trainings, or do I discover other explanations of truth extra reliable for obtaining what I want or keeping me risk-free? Do I trust him to tell me the truth, even when it consists of unlikely as well as unnoticeable points? Do I trust him to have the love, the will, and the power to conserve me regardless of the methods I am not worthy? Do I trust him to maintain his guarantees? Do I believe?

What complicates this inquiry of idea, obviously, is that our belief options are not black and white. Few of us would consciously pick to think Satan over God wickedness over excellent, yet selections are hardly ever that obvious. On any kind of given issue, which is God’s perspective and also which is Satan’s? Who or what represents God’s view most accurately? Can I trust myself to discern precisely, or to weather sensations of loss or betrayal if points do not go as I anticipate when I ask God for healing favors? At what factor do I desert one collection of beliefs as false or insufficient and accept a brand-new globe view? While various individuals address these inquiries in various methods, such questions remain at the heart of spirituality as well as religion.

Also if we desire God’s paradigm over all others, the scriptural tales currently mentioned suggest that difficulties need to be expected by followers in all ages. Like the Jews of old, we may be angered by lessons or talks or teachings irregular with our sensibilities concerning what is moral, sensible, or sensible. Like the father with the sick child, a life catastrophe may create us to both seek God as well as wonder what we can genuinely anticipate from Him. Like Nephi, we might encounter the decision to comply with a spiritual leader whose mistakes or weak points are both glaring and impactful in our lives. Or like the bro of Jared we may just be asked to choose, although we assumed we had actually currently made that choice, whether or not to think God, even when his words are however a faint echo in our struggling heart.

In my experience, neither critics nor apologists for the Church do much to convince me whether to think. Disputes, analysis, and clinical proof might alternately weaken or sustain my ideas, but belief itself is an option I battle God for, somewhere in a dark swampland of my inner landscape, where not only God’s integrity however my own go to risk. This is Jacob’s experience on the night he separates his children throughout the Jordan River to attempt to lessen the damages he makes sure is about to be caused by his brother Esau, reportedly on his way with an army in tow. Jacob, we are informed, is “considerably terrified and also distressed” 5 as he attempts to react to the threat of his bro’s unavoidable arrival. He as well as Esau did not component on excellent terms, and Jacob’s noticeable deceptiveness of his bro may figure right into his concern of. We have reason to fear when problem intimidates us as well, because we often recognize that we are not devoid of infraction towards God or any kind of man. So this is one of those moments when the concern is not just, “will God maintain his guarantees to me,” but additionally, “did I recognize those assurances properly,” “does my conduct give me a right to anticipate them to be fulfilled for me,” as well as “do I understand properly the nature of God’s compassion and also the degree of his power?”.

Read a transcript here: http://www.fairlds.org/fair-conferences/2005-fair-conference/2005-believest-thou-faith-cognitive-dissonance-and-the-psychology-of-religious-experience

Wendy Ulrich’s 2005 FAIR conference address
Video Rating: / 5

Please follow and like us:

Like it? Share with your friends!

0
CJ

9 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Ulrich's Mormon Liberal thinking is clear. She says, "Maybe the presenters at this conference will address some of the specific issues on which rational people may differ in regards to the LDS church which claims authority to act in God's name. Both thoughtful and questionably intentioned individuals may have differing views of Church history, scripture, policy, leaders, and claims. In exploring these questions, I find it questionable to assume that God can only be known by what He reveals himself to us and not by man's reason alone. I also think is reasonable that God would be reasonable, and that it is reasonable for us to try to use reason to understand him in the absence of complete revelation." She then insists that, "The questions about the ethics of polygamy, the science of DNA evidence for the Book of Mormon, the meaning of race or the history of a Church policy are appropriately approached by reason when revelation is silent."

    Ulrich's ignorance in these statements is typical of Mormon Liberal culture. She has no concept of faith in the absence of answers. Her sole fallback is reason, that is, her thinking. She also has no understanding of the simple scriptural concept of "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts," (Isaiah 55:8-9.). She feels entitled to know. If not, then God is not "reasonable." Quintessential Mormon Liberal "Progressive" attitude.  
    I don't know why Fair Mormon allows Mormon Liberal philosophy to be blathered at its conferences. It has nothing to do with apologetics. They pollute their mission when they invite detractions like this. This talk does not belong in a Fair Mormon forum, but rather at a Sunstone symposium — where the libs and their apostate friends will receive it with applause.

  2. Why waste so much time about not talking about the psychology of religion???? And stop crying and being emotion, and start talking scientificly about religion.. Damn the emotional shit talk.

  3. While I'm not Mormon, I am inspired by the speaker's self-knowledge, spiritual depth and intellectual honesty

  4. it's amazing how one can analyze a phenomenon with high perspicuity and yet allow this very perspicuity to serve as an epistemic obstacle…cognitive dissonance at its best…it made me both wistful and sad…